Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma
45 Overall Score
vs
Canon 6906C002

Canon 6906C002

Canon
75 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Sigma
47
Canon
86
Macro
Sigma
37
Canon
85
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Canon
82
Professional
Sigma
46
Canon
78
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
46
Canon
74
Travel
Sigma
39
Canon
74
Budget
Sigma
55
Canon
73
Street
Sigma
52
Canon
66
Portrait
Sigma
60
Canon
49

Specifications

Sigma 736101 50-500mmCanon 6906C002
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min50 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm28 mm
Elements2016
Groups1613
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements44
Coatingsuper coatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EFCanon RF
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.86 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMSTM★
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—5.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—250 mm★
Max Magnification—1:3.85★

Pros & Cons

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Canon 6906C002

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Pricing

Canon 6906C002 is $408 cheaper (1.4x less).

Sigma 736101 50-500mm0.032score per dollar
vs
Canon 6906C0020.075score per dollar

Canon 6906C002 offers 2.3x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon 6906C002

Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.

Sigma 736101 50-500mm Better at:

Portrait

Canon 6906C002 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider