Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma
45 Overall Score
vs
Nikon Nikkor 1986 200mm

Nikon Nikkor 1986 200mm

Nikon
61 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
37
Nikon
69
Portrait
Sigma
60
Nikon
66
Budget
Sigma
55
Nikon
65
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Nikon
54
Street
Sigma
52
Nikon
52
Professional
Sigma
46
Nikon
49
Landscape
Sigma
47
Nikon
37
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
46
Nikon
38
Travel
Sigma
39
Nikon
37

Specifications

Sigma 736101 50-500mmNikon Nikkor 1986 200mm
Optics
Typetelephototelephoto
Focal Length Min50 mm80 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm200 mm
Elements20—
Groups16—
ED Elements4★—
Coatingsuper coatingNikon Super Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperture4-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EFNikon F
Format—full-frame★
Weight1.86 kg1.31 kg★
Filter Thread—77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMAF
Focus
Min Focus Distance—35 mm★

Pros & Cons

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Nikon Nikkor 1986 200mm

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong versatility (78th percentile)
  • Below average build (13th percentile)13th %ile

Pricing

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Nikon Nikkor 1986 200mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon Nikkor 1986 200mm

Scores 61 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 17 specs.

Sigma 736101 50-500mm Better at:

LandscapeWildlife Sports

Nikon Nikkor 1986 200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

Also Consider