Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Sigma
45 Overall Score
vs
Laowa 58mm f/2.8

Laowa 58mm f/2.8

Laowa
66 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
37
Laowa
84
Portrait
Sigma
60
Laowa
72
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Laowa
62
Budget
Sigma
55
Laowa
60
Street
Sigma
52
Laowa
59
Professional
Sigma
46
Laowa
58
Landscape
Sigma
47
Laowa
38
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
46
Laowa
42
Travel
Sigma
39
Laowa
34

Specifications

Sigma 736101 50-500mmLaowa 58mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephotomacro
Focal Length Min50 mm58 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm58 mm
Elements2014
Groups1611
ED Elements4★—
Coatingsuper coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperture4-6.3f/22
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—13★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Format—Full-Frame★
Weight1.86 kg0.59 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSM—
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—185 mm★
Max Magnification—2:1★

Pros & Cons

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Laowa 58mm f/2.8

  • Strong macro (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Laowa 58mm f/2.8 is $908 cheaper (2.8x less).

Sigma 736101 50-500mm0.032score per dollar
vs
Laowa 58mm f/2.80.131score per dollar

Laowa 58mm f/2.8 offers 4.1x better value for money

Sigma 736101 50-500mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Laowa 58mm f/2.8

Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.

Sigma 736101 50-500mm Better at:

TravelLandscapeWildlife Sports

Laowa 58mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

Also Consider