Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.4 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.4 XF 56mm

Viltrox
66 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
84 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.4 XF 56mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Viltrox lenses reviewed here consistently impress users with their sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value for money. Many reviewers highlight the lightweight and compact design, making them ideal for travel and events. Common criticisms include the lack of a click stop on the aperture ring and occasional autofocus issues in video mode, but overall sentiment is highly positive.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Smooth bokeh
Cons
  • No click stop on aperture ring
  • Autofocus issues in video mode
  • Plastic build feels cheap
  • Vignetting at wide apertures
  • Color quantization in images
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 10
👍 Autofocus performance 12
👍 Image quality 14
👎 Aperture ring design 5
👍 Weight and portability 8

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Scores

Budget
Viltrox
64
Canon
93
Travel
Viltrox
62
Canon
81
Portrait
Viltrox
62
Canon
80
Street
Viltrox
69
Canon
79
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
59
Canon
78
Video Cinema
Viltrox
68
Canon
77
Landscape
Viltrox
59
Canon
70
Professional
Viltrox
66
Canon
67
Macro
Viltrox
56
Canon
61

Specifications

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.4 XF 56mmCanon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min56 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm250 mm
Elements1015
Groups912
Aspherical Elements1★0
ED Elements11
CoatingHD Nano multilayer coatingSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.44-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountFujifilm XCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.29 kg★0.38 kg
Filter Thread52 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMSTM
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance600 mm★850 mm
Max Magnification1:10★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.4 XF 56mm

  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.4 XF 56mm0.365score per dollar
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM0.424score per dollar

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM offers 1.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider