Simmod APSARA PRESTIGE 24 24mm

Simmod APSARA PRESTIGE 24 24mm

Simmod
41 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
97 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Simmod
36
Tamron
98
Budget
Simmod
33
Tamron
96
Professional
Simmod
34
Tamron
92
Macro
Simmod
67
Tamron
91
Travel
Simmod
25
Tamron
87
Portrait
Simmod
33
Tamron
85
Landscape
Simmod
31
Tamron
84
Street
Simmod
35
Tamron
79
Wildlife Sports
Simmod
32
Tamron
75

Specifications

Simmod APSARA PRESTIGE 24 24mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min24 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm70 mm
Elements1516
Groups912
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades13★9
Build
MountARRI PLSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight—0.54 kg★
Filter Thread86 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—RXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance229 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1.5x★1:4.8

Pros & Cons

Simmod APSARA PRESTIGE 24 24mm

  • Strong macro (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is $350 cheaper (1.6x less).

Simmod APSARA PRESTIGE 24 24mm0.043score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.162score per dollar

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD offers 3.8x better value for money

Simmod APSARA PRESTIGE 24 24mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider