Vivitar 4358W 58mm

Vivitar 4358W 58mm

Vivitar
40 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Vivitar
37
Nikon
89
Budget
Vivitar
41
Nikon
85
Street
Vivitar
55
Nikon
84
Macro
Vivitar
20
Nikon
84
Portrait
Vivitar
50
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Vivitar
40
Nikon
82
Landscape
Vivitar
28
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Vivitar
37
Nikon
73
Travel
Vivitar
36
Nikon
70

Specifications

Vivitar 4358W 58mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min58 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max58 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/2.8
Min Aperture—f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountM42Nikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.18 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Stepping Motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Vivitar 4358W 58mm

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Vivitar 4358W 58mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider