Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon
82 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

No customer feedback yet

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

92 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and excellent image quality. Users highlight its fast and silent autofocus, weather sealing, and versatility for street, portrait, and travel photography. While some note it is not a macro lens and lacks the extreme bokeh of the f/1.4 version, most agree it offers outstanding value as a standard prime.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Weather sealing
  • Versatile for street, portrait, and travel
Cons
  • Not a macro lens
  • Less bokeh than f/1.4 version
  • No zoom capability
  • Tapered design may look odd
👍 Image quality 10
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Portability 9
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Weather sealing 4

Scores

Travel
Nikon
96
Fujifilm
67
Landscape
Nikon
96
Fujifilm
58
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
86
Fujifilm
62
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
69
Macro
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
65
Street
Nikon
67
Fujifilm
73
Professional
Nikon
71
Fujifilm
70
Video Cinema
Nikon
66
Fujifilm
64
Portrait
Nikon
50
Fujifilm
58

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VRFujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min18 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max140 mm35 mm
Elements179
Groups136
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements22
CoatingMulti-CoatedNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperture22-40★f/16
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.32 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread62 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorstepping motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:31:7

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm is $295 cheaper (2.2x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR0.153score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.317score per dollar

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm offers 2.1x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Scores 82 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm Better at:

StreetPortrait

Also Consider