Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

Panasonic
85 Overall Score
vs
Nikon 20107

Nikon 20107

Nikon
67 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

88 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 lens is highly praised for its versatility, image quality, and value, especially as an all-around zoom for L-mount cameras like the Leica SL and Panasonic S series. Users consistently highlight its excellent stabilization, macro capabilities, and weather sealing, though some note it is not the sharpest at pixel level and the OIS switch can be soft. Overall, it is seen as a practical, lighter alternative to the Leica 24-90, with many calling it a go-to lens for both photo and video.

Pros
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Great macro capabilities
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Versatile 24-105mm focal range
  • Constant f/4 aperture
Cons
  • Not the sharpest at pixel level
  • Soft OIS switch
  • Slightly slower autofocus than kit lens
  • Heavy for some users
  • Large lens bag included
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Image stabilization 5
👍 Macro capability 5
👍 Build quality 4
🤔 Weight and size 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4

Nikon 20107

78 out of 100 high confidence 54 reviews

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its excellent value, sharpness, and fast f/2.8 aperture, making it a popular choice for portraits, events, and general photography. Many users find it a great budget alternative to the more expensive 24-70mm f/2.8 S, noting only minor differences in image quality. However, some reviewers report issues with autofocus reliability, softness at wide apertures, and noticeable vignetting, which can be a concern for professional work. Overall, it is seen as a solid, affordable lens for enthusiasts and those new to the Z system.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast f/2.8 aperture
  • Lightweight and balanced
  • Great for portraits and events
Cons
  • Autofocus reliability issues
  • Softness at wide apertures
  • Noticeable vignetting
  • Not as sharp as S-line lenses
  • Build quality feels cheaper
👍 Value for money 12
🤔 Image sharpness 10
🤔 Autofocus performance 8
🤔 Build quality 7
👎 Vignetting 5
👍 Bokeh 4

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
89
Nikon
75
Budget
Panasonic
83
Nikon
73
Professional
Panasonic
80
Nikon
68
Video Cinema
Panasonic
80
Nikon
60
Portrait
Panasonic
79
Nikon
48
Landscape
Panasonic
76
Nikon
69
Travel
Panasonic
68
Nikon
64
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
67
Nikon
62
Street
Panasonic
67
Nikon
56

Specifications

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.Nikon 20107
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm75 mm
Elements1615
Groups1312
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements4★2
Coating—antifouling coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.18 kg0.57 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto FocusStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:21:2.94

Pros & Cons

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (24th percentile)

Nikon 20107

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon 20107 is $190 cheaper (1.2x less).

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S. Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider