Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R
Olympus
63 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Street
Travel
Portrait
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | — |
| Focal Length Min | 40 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 150 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 4.0-5.6 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | — |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | — |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | MSC | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 900 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.25★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pricing
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R0.262score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R offers 4.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R
Scores 63 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 14 specs.
