Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon
51 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
56
Nikon
89
Macro
Canon
44
Nikon
88
Budget
Canon
60
Nikon
85
Street
Canon
52
Nikon
84
Portrait
Canon
47
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Canon
54
Nikon
82
Landscape
Canon
44
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Canon
53
Nikon
73
Travel
Canon
41
Nikon
70

Specifications

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements813
Groups611
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements13★
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades89★
Build
MountCanon EFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.95 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.19x1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm0.043score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.0x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider