TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm
TTArtisan
42 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
82 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm | Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 6 | 9 |
| Groups | 5 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | multi-layer coating | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.20 kg | 0.13 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 43 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 350 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:7★ |
Pros & Cons
TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm0.667score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm0.340score per dollar
TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
