Sirui 56AS12E-W

Sirui 56AS12E-W

Sirui
64 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sirui 56AS12E-W

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This lens is praised for its affordability and quality, especially for portrait and interview photography. Users love the bokeh, color rendering, and dreamy look at f/2.2, though autofocus is slower than some other lenses and video mode has a minor reset issue. It is an APS-C lens, so full-frame users need to use Super 35 mode.

Pros
  • Affordable price
  • Great bokeh
  • Good autofocus
  • Beautiful color rendering
  • Dreamy look at f/2.2
Cons
  • Slower autofocus than 75mm
  • Video mode reset issue
  • APS-C only, not full frame
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Image quality 3
🤔 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Build quality 2
👎 Video mode issues 1
👎 Compatibility 1

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Sirui
58
Nikon
88
Portrait
Sirui
58
Nikon
88
Budget
Sirui
63
Nikon
84
Macro
Sirui
59
Nikon
84
Street
Sirui
62
Nikon
82
Video Cinema
Sirui
68
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sirui
52
Nikon
78
Wildlife Sports
Sirui
56
Nikon
72
Travel
Sirui
43
Nikon
70

Specifications

Sirui 56AS12E-WNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min56 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm28 mm
Elements1213
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements13★
CoatingHD Nano coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.42 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance600 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Sirui 56AS12E-W

  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (75th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Sirui 56AS12E-W is $788 cheaper (4.0x less).

Sirui 56AS12E-W0.246score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.086score per dollar

Sirui 56AS12E-W offers 2.9x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider