Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
84 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 56/1.2 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.2 XF 56mm

Viltrox
57 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Viltrox AF 56/1.2 XF 56mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

The VILTROX 56mm F1.2 lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast and quiet autofocus, excellent low-light performance, and great value for money. A few users note a floating element or internal rattling when off, which is explained as normal VCM motor behavior. One verified buyer received a used lens instead of new, and another found it too large for a compact body.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Great low-light performance
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Floating element design
  • Internal rattling when off
  • Received used instead of new
  • Too large for compact bodies
  • Autofocus hunting in extreme low light
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Low light performance 4
🤔 Floating element rattle 4

Scores

Budget
Canon
93
Viltrox
57
Travel
Canon
81
Viltrox
44
Portrait
Canon
80
Viltrox
59
Street
Canon
79
Viltrox
50
Wildlife Sports
Canon
78
Viltrox
47
Video Cinema
Canon
77
Viltrox
59
Landscape
Canon
70
Viltrox
49
Professional
Canon
67
Viltrox
59
Macro
Canon
61
Viltrox
56

Specifications

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMViltrox AF 56/1.2 XF 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min55 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm56 mm
Elements1513
Groups128
Aspherical Elements01★
ED Elements11
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingHD Multilayer Nanocoating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-5.6f/1.2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades711★
Build
MountCanon EF-SFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.38 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★VCM Focusing Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance850 mm500 mm★
Max Magnification0.29x1:7.7★

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Viltrox AF 56/1.2 XF 56mm

  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM0.423score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 56/1.2 XF 56mm0.318score per dollar

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM offers 1.3x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider