Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 30mm
Sigma
32 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Nikon
83 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Professional
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Specifications
| Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 30mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 30 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 30 mm | 140 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/0.95 | 22-40★ |
| Min Aperture | f/3.6 | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-M | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 4.13 kg | 0.32 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:3★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 30mm
- Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average build (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 30mm0.021score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR0.155score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR offers 7.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Scores 83 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 12 of 22 specs.
