Sigma 879955

Sigma 879955

Sigma
38 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
38
Canon
97
Portrait
Sigma
53
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sigma
39
Canon
90
Street
Sigma
54
Canon
82
Travel
Sigma
35
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
38
Canon
77
Landscape
Sigma
24
Canon
76
Professional
Sigma
38
Canon
75
Macro
Sigma
18
Canon
68

Specifications

Sigma 879955Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min18 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.19 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 879955

  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Sigma 8799550.109score per dollar
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM0.267score per dollar

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM offers 2.4x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider