Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

Retropia
45 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

45 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

This lens is a fun, low-cost toy for creating vintage-looking photos, but it has serious quality and compatibility issues. Many users praise its unique color effects and lightweight build, but a significant number report it simply doesn't work or fails to meet advertised expectations. The lack of autofocus, problematic purple vignetting, and missing parts for the Oreo-style design are common complaints. It's best suited for casual experimentation with realistic expectations.

Pros
  • Unique vintage color effects
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Fun for casual photography
  • Low price point
  • Good build quality for toy lens
Cons
  • Incompatibility with some camera modes
  • Purple vignetting can be overwhelming
  • Missing advertised parts (Oreo design)
  • No autofocus or manual focus
  • Some units non-functional (completely opaque)
🤔 Image quality 7
🤔 Build quality 4
🤔 Value for money 5
👎 Compatibility 3
👎 Vignetting 2
👎 Advertising accuracy 4

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Retropia
42
Nikon
89
Portrait
Retropia
45
Nikon
88
Macro
Retropia
38
Nikon
84
Budget
Retropia
49
Nikon
84
Street
Retropia
48
Nikon
82
Video Cinema
Retropia
49
Nikon
81
Landscape
Retropia
35
Nikon
78
Wildlife Sports
Retropia
35
Nikon
72
Travel
Retropia
47
Nikon
70

Specifications

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min32 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max32 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/11f/2.8
Min Aperturef/11f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.05 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.50 m190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm is $1,010 cheaper (26.3x less).

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm1.115score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.086score per dollar

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm offers 13.0x better value for money

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider