TTArtisan Z Mount 35mm
TTArtisan
29 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Macro
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Specifications
| TTArtisan Z Mount 35mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | — |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | T2.1 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weight | 0.91 kg★ | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm★ | — |
Pros & Cons
TTArtisan Z Mount 35mm
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Below average build (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pricing
TTArtisan Z Mount 35mm0.076score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
TTArtisan Z Mount 35mm offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 13 specs.
