Viltrox AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm
Viltrox
61 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
82 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| Viltrox AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm | Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 6 | 9 |
| Groups | 6 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 2 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | multilayer nanocoating | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4.5 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | f/4.5 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.06 kg★ | 0.13 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 350 mm | 350 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:10 | 1:7 |
Pros & Cons
Viltrox AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong macro (67th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Viltrox AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm0.771score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm0.340score per dollar
Viltrox AF 28/4.5 Z 28mm offers 2.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Scores 82 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.
