Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm
Sigma
33 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 300 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 600 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 19 |
| Groups | — | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | — | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.57 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 500 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.28x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pricing
Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm0.005score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.123score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR offers 24.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.
