Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm
Sigma
33 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.
Panasonic
85 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm | Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S. | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 300 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 600 mm | 105 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | L-Mount |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 1.18 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Auto Focus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 300 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (25th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Sports 300-600mm f/4 DG OS 300-600mm0.005score per dollar
vs
Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.0.083score per dollar
Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S. offers 16.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
