Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm

Sirui
38 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sirui
35
Sony
100
Street
Sirui
40
Sony
89
Travel
Sirui
21
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Sirui
32
Sony
84
Portrait
Sirui
44
Sony
83
Video Cinema
Sirui
47
Sony
83
Professional
Sirui
43
Sony
73
Landscape
Sirui
31
Sony
73
Macro
Sirui
50
Sony
69

Specifications

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mmSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements2016
Groups1612
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—2★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.93.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades16★7
Build
MountInterchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight1.00 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread92 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance650 mm450 mm★
Max Magnification1:23.26★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm

  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is $201 cheaper (1.3x less).

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm0.038score per dollar
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.112score per dollar

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 2.9x better value for money

Sirui IronStar IRON-35-N 35mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider