Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox
70 Overall Score
vs
Tamron SP AFG005S-700 60mm

Tamron SP AFG005S-700 60mm

Tamron
45 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Viltrox
75
Tamron
41
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Tamron
36
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
68
Tamron
39
Macro
Viltrox
59
Tamron
68
Budget
Viltrox
66
Tamron
39
Professional
Viltrox
59
Tamron
39
Travel
Viltrox
59
Tamron
35
Landscape
Viltrox
57
Tamron
39
Video Cinema
Viltrox
56
Tamron
34

Specifications

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mmTamron SP AFG005S-700 60mm
Optics
Typeprimemacro
Focal Length Min56 mm60 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm60 mm
Elements1114
Groups910
ED Elements42
CoatingHD nano-coatingBroad-Band Anti-Reflective Coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1622
Min Aperture1.72
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony ESony A
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.17 kg0.39 kg
Filter Thread52 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm230 mm
Max Magnification1:9.091:1

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron SP AFG005S-700 60mm

  • Strong macro (79th percentile)
  • Strong optical (70th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (25th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm is $206 cheaper (2.4x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm0.487score per dollar
vs
Tamron SP AFG005S-700 60mm0.129score per dollar

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm offers 3.8x better value for money

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Tamron SP AFG005S-700 60mm

Verdict

Winner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Scores 70 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron SP AFG005S-700 60mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider