Meyer-Optik Görlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 II 100mm
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
24 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Meyer-Optik Görlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 II 100mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 3 | — |
| Groups | 3 | — |
| Coating | Coated Schott Optical Glass | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 15★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weight | 0.32 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 899 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:1★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Meyer-Optik Görlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 II 100mm
- Strong build (73rd percentile)
- Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Pricing
Meyer-Optik Görlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 II 100mm0.024score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.062score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 2.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 43 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 18 specs.
