Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S

Nikon
67 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S

92 out of 100 high confidence 37 reviews

The Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, versatile zoom range, and effective vibration reduction. Users highlight its superb build quality and excellent performance in low light, making it a favorite for portraits, landscapes, and general photography. While some note its significant weight and size, and a few mention tight filter threads or high price, the overwhelming sentiment is that it delivers outstanding image quality and is a worthwhile investment for serious photographers.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness and detail
  • Versatile 24-70mm zoom range
  • Effective vibration reduction (VR)
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Superb build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • High price point
  • Tight filter threads
  • No tripod collar included
  • Not compatible with older DSLRs
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Versatility 7
👍 Low light performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Nikon
57
Budget
Sony
91
Nikon
68
Street
Sony
90
Nikon
49
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Nikon
57
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Nikon
49
Landscape
Sony
79
Nikon
71
Portrait
Sony
78
Nikon
41
Professional
Sony
77
Nikon
58
Macro
Sony
66
Nikon
62

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSNikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm70 mm
Elements915
Groups811
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements13★
Coating—Nano Crystal & Super Integrated Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★1.07 kg
Filter Thread41 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★380 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:3.7★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S

  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is $272 cheaper (1.8x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S0.109score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 2.3x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider