Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

92 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and excellent image quality. Users highlight its fast and silent autofocus, weather sealing, and versatility for street, portrait, and travel photography. While some note it is not a macro lens and lacks the extreme bokeh of the f/1.4 version, most agree it offers outstanding value as a standard prime.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Weather sealing
  • Versatile for street, portrait, and travel
Cons
  • Not a macro lens
  • Less bokeh than f/1.4 version
  • No zoom capability
  • Tapered design may look odd
👍 Image quality 10
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Portability 9
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Weather sealing 4

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Fujifilm
67
Budget
Sony
91
Fujifilm
69
Street
Sony
90
Fujifilm
74
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Fujifilm
64
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Fujifilm
63
Landscape
Sony
79
Fujifilm
58
Portrait
Sony
78
Fujifilm
54
Professional
Sony
77
Fujifilm
71
Macro
Sony
66
Fujifilm
65

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSFujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm35 mm
Elements99
Groups86
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements12★
Coating—Nano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.17 kg
Filter Thread41 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusstepping motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:7★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm is $108 cheaper (1.5x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.315score per dollar

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm offers 1.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider