Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 270101 70mm

Sigma Art 270101 70mm

Sigma
69 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Sigma Art 270101 70mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 34 reviews

The Sigma 70mm f/2.8 Art macro lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its exceptional sharpness, image quality, and value. Users praise its compact, lightweight design and versatility for macro, portrait, and product photography. While autofocus speed is a common criticism, especially at macro distances, most reviewers find it acceptable given the lens's price and optical performance. Some minor issues include focus hunting, lack of image stabilization, and a firmware bug affecting focus retention.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Great value for money
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile for macro and portraits
  • Beautiful bokeh
Cons
  • Slow autofocus
  • Focus hunting at macro distances
  • No image stabilization
  • Lens extends when focusing
  • Firmware bug with focus retention
👍 Image quality 20
👎 Autofocus speed 15
👍 Value for money 12
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Versatility 7
👎 Focus hunting 5

Scores

Travel
Sony
98
Sigma
38
Street
Sony
90
Sigma
64
Budget
Sony
86
Sigma
59
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Sigma
66
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Sigma
46
Portrait
Sony
83
Sigma
80
Landscape
Sony
82
Sigma
47
Macro
Sony
66
Sigma
81
Professional
Sony
77
Sigma
65

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mmSigma Art 270101 70mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm70 mm
Elements913
Groups810
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements13★
Coating—Super multi-layer lens coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.11 kg★0.53 kg
Filter Thread41 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAuto Focus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★258 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:1★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Sigma Art 270101 70mm

  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm is $201 cheaper (1.6x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm0.259score per dollar
vs
Sigma Art 270101 70mm0.126score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm offers 2.1x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sigma Art 270101 70mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma Art 270101 70mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider