Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon
72 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Canon
58
Budget
Sony
91
Canon
70
Street
Sony
90
Canon
65
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Canon
72
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
61
Macro
Sony
69
Canon
82
Landscape
Sony
79
Canon
56
Portrait
Sony
78
Canon
59
Professional
Sony
77
Canon
64

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm45 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements1★—
Coating—Super Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.64.5-6.3
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon RF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.41 kg
Filter Thread41 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm45 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (78th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Pricing

Canon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM is $231 cheaper (3.0x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255score per dollar
vs
Canon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM0.618score per dollar

Canon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM offers 2.4x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon RF 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Better at:

Macro

Also Consider