Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports 200mm

Sigma Sports 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports 200mm

Sigma
48 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Sigma Sports 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports 200mm

92 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The Sigma 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports Lens receives high praise for its superb image quality, fast autofocus, and beautiful bokeh, making it ideal for weddings and portraits. Users note its weight is comparable to other 70-200 f/2.8 lenses but manageable, and the stabilization performs well. The only recurring complaint is that Sony E-mount limits burst rate to 15 fps. The lens lacks teleconverter compatibility, which is clarified in Q&A.

Pros
  • Superb image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great for weddings and portraits
Cons
  • Relatively heavy
  • 15 fps burst limit on Sony E-mount
  • No teleconverter compatibility
👍 Image quality 3
👍 Autofocus performance 2
👍 Bokeh 3
👍 Stabilization 1
🤔 Weight 2
👎 Burst rate limit 1

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Sigma
33
Budget
Sony
91
Sigma
37
Street
Sony
90
Sigma
40
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Sigma
58
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Sigma
51
Landscape
Sony
79
Sigma
49
Portrait
Sony
78
Sigma
39
Professional
Sony
77
Sigma
53
Macro
Sony
66
Sigma
52

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSSigma Sports 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports 200mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm200 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm200 mm
Elements919
Groups814
Aspherical Elements4★0
ED Elements14★
Coating—Nano Porous & Super Multi-Layer Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades711★
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★1.82 kg
Filter Thread41 mm105 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusHLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★1.70 m
Max Magnification0.215x1:7.6★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Sigma Sports 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports 200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is $2,651 cheaper (8.6x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255score per dollar
vs
Sigma Sports 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports 200mm0.016score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 15.9x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider