Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

Sigma
70 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

84 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

This Sigma 70-300mm lens is widely praised for its excellent value, delivering sharp images, good bokeh, and a useful macro function at a budget price. Many users note it's ideal for amateur photographers, though the autofocus can be slow and noisy, and image quality softens slightly at 300mm without a tripod. Overall, it's considered a fantastic performance-to-price winner for those not needing professional-grade telephoto capabilities.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Good bokeh effect
  • Useful macro function
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Noisy autofocus motor
  • Softness at 300mm without tripod
  • Rotating front element for polarizers
  • Weighty for long hikes
👍 Value for money 10
👍 Image quality 12
👎 Autofocus performance 8
👍 Build quality 7
👍 Macro function 5
👍 Optical stabilization 5

Scores

Travel
Sony
95
Sigma
55
Budget
Sony
90
Sigma
73
Street
Sony
89
Sigma
63
Portrait
Sony
84
Sigma
76
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Sigma
64
Wildlife Sports
Sony
83
Sigma
62
Landscape
Sony
79
Sigma
59
Professional
Sony
77
Sigma
59
Macro
Sony
66
Sigma
67

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mmSigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm300 mm
Elements914
Groups810
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements13★
Coating—Super Multi-Layer Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.55 kg
Filter Thread41 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★950 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro is $118 cheaper (1.5x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm0.258score per dollar
vs
Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro0.306score per dollar

Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro offers 1.2x better value for money

Sigma DG OS 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider