Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm

Canon
52 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm

82 out of 100 high confidence 287 reviews

The Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM lens is widely praised for its exceptional value, delivering sharp images and beautiful bokeh at a very low price. Users love its lightweight, compact design and fast f/1.8 aperture for low-light and portrait photography. Common criticisms include noisy and sometimes slow autofocus, a plastic build that feels cheap, and softness at the edges when wide open. Overall, it's considered a must-have budget prime lens for Canon shooters.

Pros
  • Exceptional value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Fast f/1.8 aperture for low light
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus
  • Slow autofocus at times
  • Plastic build feels cheap
  • Soft edges at f/1.8
  • No image stabilization
👍 Value for money 45
👍 Image quality 38
👍 Bokeh 22
🤔 Autofocus performance 18
👎 Build quality 15
👍 Low light performance 12

Scores

Travel
Sony
98
Canon
57
Street
Sony
90
Canon
55
Budget
Sony
86
Canon
54
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Canon
53
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
44
Portrait
Sony
83
Canon
41
Landscape
Sony
82
Canon
39
Professional
Sony
78
Canon
45
Macro
Sony
66
Canon
42

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm50 mm
Elements96
Groups85
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements1★0
Coating—Super Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon EF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.11 kg★0.16 kg
Filter Thread41 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops7 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification0.215x★0.21x

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm is $215 cheaper (2.6x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.259score per dollar
vs
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm0.390score per dollar

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM 50mm offers 1.5x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider