VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ

VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ

VENUS-LAOWA
34 Overall Score
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
VENUS-LAOWA
22
Sony
94
Budget
VENUS-LAOWA
37
Sony
91
Street
VENUS-LAOWA
42
Sony
90
Video Cinema
VENUS-LAOWA
35
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
VENUS-LAOWA
30
Sony
84
Landscape
VENUS-LAOWA
18
Sony
79
Portrait
VENUS-LAOWA
48
Sony
78
Professional
VENUS-LAOWA
31
Sony
77
Macro
VENUS-LAOWA
17
Sony
66

Specifications

VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min25 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max25 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—1★
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
Mount—Sony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.40 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread—41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Autofocus
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Pros & Cons

VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ

  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

VENUS-LAOWA VE2528NZ0.084score per dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 3.0x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider