Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
61 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

88 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens is highly praised for its versatility, image stabilization, and image quality. Users appreciate it as an excellent all-purpose lens for beginners and enthusiasts, though some note the lens extends under its own weight and one experienced a failure after three years. Overall, it delivers great value and performance for its price.

Pros
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Versatile zoom range
  • Good image quality
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Macro mode for close-ups
Cons
  • Lens extends under its own weight
  • Autofocus failure after 3 years (one case)
  • Not a true macro lens
  • IS not recommended on tripod
  • Image quality not L-series level
👍 Image stabilization 6
👍 Versatility 5
👍 Image quality 5
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Build quality 3
👍 Autofocus performance 3

Scores

Budget
Nikon
84
Canon
60
Portrait
Nikon
81
Canon
34
Street
Nikon
75
Canon
47
Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
54
Travel
Nikon
71
Canon
55
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Canon
53
Landscape
Nikon
68
Canon
58
Professional
Nikon
64
Canon
45
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Canon
60

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm135 mm
Elements—16
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Integrated Coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/28
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weight0.48 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SUSM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm★508 mm

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm is $45 cheaper (1.2x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.372score per dollar
vs
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM0.215score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm offers 1.7x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Also Consider