Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
88 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

Viltrox
86 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 lens is widely praised as an exceptional value, delivering sharp images, good color rendition, and solid autofocus at a fraction of the cost of Sony alternatives. Users highlight its lightweight, compact design, making it ideal for travel and everyday carry. While some note it lacks weather sealing and the maximum aperture is f/2.5 rather than f/2, most find the optical quality and performance far exceed expectations for the price. A few mention it may require some post-processing, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Good autofocus performance
  • Pleasant color rendition
Cons
  • No weather sealing
  • Maximum aperture f/2.5 (not f/2)
  • Plastic build (except mount)
  • May require post-processing
  • Manual focus not linear
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Image quality 7
🤔 Build quality 5
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Size and weight 6
👎 Weather sealing 2

Scores

Street
Nikon
72
Viltrox
91
Budget
Nikon
87
Viltrox
82
Portrait
Nikon
77
Viltrox
87
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Viltrox
78
Macro
Nikon
73
Viltrox
66
Travel
Nikon
69
Viltrox
66
Professional
Nikon
62
Viltrox
68
Landscape
Nikon
68
Viltrox
58
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Viltrox
67

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmViltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm40 mm
Elements—10
Groups—6
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Integrated Coatinghigh-definition nano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.5
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon FSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.48 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm340 mm★
Max Magnification—0.34m-∞★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm is $105 cheaper (1.8x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.367score per dollar
vs
Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm0.637score per dollar

Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm offers 1.7x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm wins 3 specs while Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm wins 5.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscape

Viltrox 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm Better at:

StreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider