Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Sony E SEL30M35 30mm

Sony E SEL30M35 30mm

Sony
54 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Sony E SEL30M35 30mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 69 reviews

This Sony 30mm macro lens is widely praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent value, especially for beginners and hobbyists. Users love its macro capabilities and versatility as a standard prime, but many note the short working distance and slow autofocus as drawbacks. Overall, it's a great budget-friendly option for Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Great value for money
  • True 1:1 macro magnification
  • Versatile as standard prime
Cons
  • Short working distance
  • Slow autofocus
  • Soft corners
  • No image stabilization
  • Lens hood incompatible with filters
👍 Image quality 25
👍 Value for money 15
👍 Portability 12
👎 Autofocus performance 10
👎 Working distance 9
👍 Build quality 7

Scores

Budget
Nikon
84
Sony
49
Portrait
Nikon
81
Sony
37
Macro
Nikon
73
Sony
75
Street
Nikon
75
Sony
53
Travel
Nikon
71
Sony
51
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Sony
40
Landscape
Nikon
68
Sony
45
Professional
Nikon
64
Sony
43
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Sony
39

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmSony E SEL30M35 30mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm30 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm30 mm
Elements—7
Groups—6
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingMulti-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/3.5
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon FSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.48 kg0.14 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm95 mm★
Max Magnification—1:1★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Sony E SEL30M35 30mm

  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.372score per dollar
vs
Sony E SEL30M35 30mm0.199score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm offers 1.9x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sony E SEL30M35 30mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider