Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mm

Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mm

Viltrox
71 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 44 reviews

The Viltrox lenses are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional value, delivering sharp image quality, solid build, and fast autofocus at a fraction of the cost of name-brand alternatives. Many users highlight the impressive performance for portraits, landscapes, and street photography, with particular acclaim for the 135mm f/1.8 and 16mm f/1.8 models. A few isolated complaints mention autofocus struggles in low light, vignetting, and minor quality control issues, but the overall sentiment is highly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Solid build construction
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
Cons
  • Autofocus struggles in low light
  • Vignetting at wide apertures
  • Minor chromatic aberration
  • No weather sealing
  • Autofocus noise audible
👍 Value for money 30
👍 Image quality 28
👍 Build quality 20
🤔 Autofocus performance 18
👍 Weight and portability 15
🤔 Low light performance 10

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Viltrox
69
Nikon
89
Portrait
Viltrox
58
Nikon
87
Budget
Viltrox
63
Nikon
84
Macro
Viltrox
68
Nikon
84
Street
Viltrox
75
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Viltrox
65
Nikon
82
Landscape
Viltrox
77
Nikon
82
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
70
Nikon
72
Travel
Viltrox
70
Nikon
70

Specifications

Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min14 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max14 mm28 mm
Elements1213
Groups911
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements4★3
CoatingHD multilayer nano coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountL-MountNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.17 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM+Lead screw★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance130 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification0.23X1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mm

  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mm is $851 cheaper (5.3x less).

Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mm0.357score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.087score per dollar

Viltrox AF 14/4.0 L 14mm offers 4.1x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider