Sigma Art 33B965 30mm
Sigma
72 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
91 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Street
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Portrait
Professional
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma Art 33B965 30mm | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 30 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 30 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | 0.33 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Linear motor | Linear motor |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | 450 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:8.1★ | 0.29x |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Art 33B965 30mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
Pricing
Sigma Art 33B965 30mm0.453score per dollar
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.114score per dollar
Sigma Art 33B965 30mm offers 4.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 20 specs.
