TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm

TTArtisan
61 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
88 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm

70 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The TTArtisan 27mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and good value, making it a popular choice for everyday carry and street photography. However, several users report issues with vignetting, soft edges, and occasional autofocus or exposure inconsistencies, especially in low light. While many find it a solid budget alternative to the Fuji 27mm pancake, some returned it due to the pronounced vignetting or lack of contrast.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Good value for the price
  • Sharp center image
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Easy-to-use aperture and focus rings
Cons
  • Pronounced vignetting
  • Soft edges and corners
  • Unreliable autofocus in low light
  • Inconsistent exposure with aperture changes
  • Lack of contrast and saturation
👍 Compactness and portability 6
👍 Value for money 5
🤔 Image sharpness 5
👎 Vignetting 4
🤔 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Build quality 3

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Scores

Budget
TTArtisan
63
Nikon
87
Portrait
TTArtisan
68
Nikon
78
Macro
TTArtisan
62
Nikon
73
Street
TTArtisan
69
Nikon
72
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
53
Nikon
71
Travel
TTArtisan
47
Nikon
68
Landscape
TTArtisan
34
Nikon
65
Professional
TTArtisan
47
Nikon
62
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
47
Nikon
61

Specifications

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mmNikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min27 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max27 mm85 mm
Elements6—
Groups5—
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Super Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades8★7
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗—
Weight0.09 kg★0.48 kg
Filter Thread39 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★AF-S
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance27 mm★380 mm

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm

  • Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm is $112 cheaper (1.9x less).

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm0.479score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.367score per dollar

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm offers 1.3x better value for money

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm F2.8 E 27mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider