Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro 23mm

Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro 23mm

Yongnuo
70 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 58 reviews

The Canon RF-S 55-210mm lens is generally well-received, especially by beginners and travel photographers who value its lightweight design, sharp images, and fast autofocus. Many users praise its performance for outdoor sports and wildlife, though some note limitations in low light due to the slow aperture and occasional distortion. A few negative reviews mention autofocus issues and a restocking fee, but overall sentiment is positive.

Pros
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast autofocus
  • Good for outdoor sports
  • Great value for price
Cons
  • Slow aperture in low light
  • Noticeable distortion
  • Autofocus issues in some cases
  • Restocking fee for returns
  • No lens lock
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Lightweight design 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 10
👍 Value for money 9
👎 Low light performance 6
👍 Image stabilization 5

Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro 23mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 19 reviews

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent build quality. Users highlight its performance in low light and video work, with many noting it as a significant upgrade. A few Q&A entries address concerns about internal movement when off, which is confirmed as normal stabilizer behavior.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Excellent build quality
  • Great low-light performance
  • Internal zoom mechanism
Cons
  • Internal movement when off (normal but concerning)
  • Heavier than similar lenses
  • Not parfocal
  • Focus-by-wire system
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Low light performance 3
👎 Internal movement concerns 3
👎 Weight 2

Scores

Travel
Canon
91
Yongnuo
52
Budget
Canon
90
Yongnuo
61
Street
Canon
85
Yongnuo
60
Video Cinema
Canon
82
Yongnuo
60
Portrait
Canon
79
Yongnuo
55
Wildlife Sports
Canon
77
Yongnuo
59
Landscape
Canon
76
Yongnuo
53
Professional
Canon
65
Yongnuo
67
Macro
Canon
60
Yongnuo
66

Specifications

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mmYongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro 23mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min55 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max210 mm23 mm
Elements1111
Groups89
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements23★
CoatingSuper Spectra Coatingnano-multilayer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5f/16
Min Aperture5-7.1f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.27 kg★0.37 kg
Filter Thread55 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Digital Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance730 mm300 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x1x★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro 23mm

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro 23mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro 23mm Better at:

MacroProfessional

Also Consider