HOLGA HL-C 60mm
HOLGA
40 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm
Canon
48 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Street
Video Cinema
Portrait
Travel
Macro
Professional
Landscape
Specifications
| HOLGA HL-C 60mm | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 60 mm | 85 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 60 mm | 85 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | ultra multi-coating (UMC) |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/8 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 8★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Canon EF |
| Format | — | Full-Frame★ |
| Weight | 0.03 kg★ | 0.42 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 853 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:7.7★ |
Pros & Cons
HOLGA HL-C 60mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm
Scores 48 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.
