Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Meike
58 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
69 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 57 reviews

The Meike lenses are widely praised for delivering impressive sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value for money, often compared favorably to much more expensive native lenses. Users highlight solid build quality, smooth manual focus rings, and pleasing bokeh, though a small number note minor issues like aperture ring looseness or focus hunting in very low light. Overall, it's seen as a fantastic budget-friendly option for photographers seeking prime performance without breaking the bank.

Pros
  • Impressive sharpness for the price
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Aperture ring has slight play on some units
  • Autofocus can hunt in very low light
  • Lens hood attachment can feel stiff
  • Minimum focus distance is somewhat long
  • Some chromatic aberration in high contrast scenes
👍 Sharpness 32
👍 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👍 Value for money 18
👍 Bokeh 14
🤔 Low light performance 10

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 95 reviews

The Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens is widely loved for its sharp image quality, fast aperture, and surprisingly low price. Users praise its lightweight design, compact size, and quick autofocus, making it an excellent everyday walk-around lens. Some note autofocus can be noisier or slower than premium lenses, and a few report chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes. A handful of complaints involve inconsistent packaging or compatibility misunderstandings, but the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality wide open
  • Fast f/1.7 aperture for low light
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Autofocus noise in quiet environments
  • Chromatic aberration in high contrast
  • No weather sealing
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Missing aperture ring
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Value for money 35
👍 Build quality 30
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 15
👍 Low light performance 18

Scores

Street
Meike
55
Viltrox
71
Macro
Meike
55
Viltrox
64
Budget
Meike
52
Viltrox
63
Portrait
Meike
48
Viltrox
62
Video Cinema
Meike
48
Viltrox
61
Wildlife Sports
Meike
39
Viltrox
59
Travel
Meike
48
Viltrox
56
Landscape
Meike
47
Viltrox
54
Professional
Meike
47
Viltrox
53

Specifications

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mmViltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min35 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm35 mm
Elements1111
Groups99
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements2★1
CoatingMultilayered Coatingsnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/16
Min Aperturef/2f/1.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.30 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread58 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm330 mm★
Max Magnification—1:7.7★

Pros & Cons

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm0.360score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm0.484score per dollar

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm offers 1.3x better value for money

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 69 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider