Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike
43 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

Panasonic
88 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Meike
39
Panasonic
96
Macro
Meike
48
Panasonic
91
Professional
Meike
32
Panasonic
90
Portrait
Meike
40
Panasonic
84
Video Cinema
Meike
32
Panasonic
83
Budget
Meike
40
Panasonic
79
Wildlife Sports
Meike
25
Panasonic
74
Travel
Meike
31
Panasonic
70
Landscape
Meike
32
Panasonic
64

Specifications

Meike 35095 m43 35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Optics
Typeprimemacro
Focal Length Min35 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm100 mm
Elements1013
Groups711
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
CoatingMulti-layer nano coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/0.95f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades13★9
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.38 kg0.30 kg★
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyDual phase linear motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm204 mm★
Max Magnification—1:1★

Pros & Cons

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

  • Strong build (66th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Meike 35095 m43 35mm is $669 cheaper (4.7x less).

Meike 35095 m43 35mm0.238score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm0.103score per dollar

Meike 35095 m43 35mm offers 2.3x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider