Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro

Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro

Sigma
73 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

No customer feedback yet

Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro

84 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

This Sigma 70-300mm lens is widely praised for its excellent value, delivering sharp images, good bokeh, and a useful macro function at a budget price. Many users note it's ideal for amateur photographers, though the autofocus can be slow and noisy, and image quality softens slightly at 300mm without a tripod. Overall, it's considered a fantastic performance-to-price winner for those not needing professional-grade telephoto capabilities.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Good bokeh effect
  • Useful macro function
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Noisy autofocus motor
  • Softness at 300mm without tripod
  • Rotating front element for polarizers
  • Weighty for long hikes
👍 Value for money 10
👍 Image quality 12
👎 Autofocus performance 8
👍 Build quality 7
👍 Macro function 5
👍 Optical stabilization 5

Scores

Portrait
Canon
45
Sigma
76
Travel
Canon
76
Sigma
59
Landscape
Canon
74
Sigma
63
Budget
Canon
66
Sigma
73
Macro
Canon
51
Sigma
68
Street
Canon
59
Sigma
65
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Sigma
65
Professional
Canon
65
Sigma
60
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Sigma
62

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMSigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm300 mm
Elements1214
Groups910
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements13★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingMulti-layer lens coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/44-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EFCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.50 kg★0.55 kg
Filter Thread77 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★950 mm
Max Magnification0.24x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro

  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro is $180 cheaper (1.8x less).

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM0.149score per dollar
vs
Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro0.319score per dollar

Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro offers 2.1x better value for money

Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro

Scores 73 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

TravelLandscapeProfessional

Sigma APO 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitVideo Cinema

Also Consider