Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm

Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm

Yongnuo
52 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

No customer feedback yet

Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

This Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 GM II lens receives high praise for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent low-light performance, especially for video work. Verified buyers call it a worthy upgrade with solid build quality. However, several questions raise concerns about loose internal parts that shift audibly when the lens is off or unattached, causing some to worry about long-term durability.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast autofocus
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great for video work
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Loose internal parts making noise
  • Durability concerns from shifting internals
  • Potential defect in early units
  • Uncertainty about long-term build quality
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Low light performance 4
🤔 Build quality 5
👎 Internal parts looseness 4
👍 Video quality 3

Scores

Travel
Canon
76
Yongnuo
36
Landscape
Canon
74
Yongnuo
37
Budget
Canon
66
Yongnuo
45
Professional
Canon
65
Yongnuo
52
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Yongnuo
45
Street
Canon
59
Yongnuo
53
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Yongnuo
51
Macro
Canon
51
Yongnuo
50
Portrait
Canon
45
Yongnuo
49

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMYongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm56 mm
Elements1210
Groups99
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingMultilayer Nano Coating, Anti-Fouling Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/16
Min Aperturef/4f/1.4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.50 kg0.37 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Digital Stepping Motor (DSM)
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★579 mm
Max Magnification0.24x1:9.09★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (66th percentile)
  • Strong build (66th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Pricing

Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm is $231 cheaper (2.3x less).

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM0.149score per dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm0.288score per dollar

Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm offers 1.9x better value for money

Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Scores 61 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Yongnuo YN 56mm f/1.4S DA DSM WL Pro 56mm Better at:

Portrait

Also Consider