Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS

Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS

Sigma
82 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS

85 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

This Sigma telephoto lens is widely praised for its excellent value, offering impressive reach and image quality at a fraction of the cost of comparable lenses. Users highlight its solid build, effective stabilization, and versatility for wildlife and outdoor photography, though many note it is heavy and struggles in low light. The autofocus can be slow and less accurate beyond 400mm, but manual override helps. Overall, it is considered a fantastic budget-friendly option for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Impressive reach (600mm)
  • Good image stabilization
  • Solid build quality
  • Versatile for wildlife and outdoor photography
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Poor low-light performance
  • Slow autofocus beyond 400mm
  • Zoom ring requires multiple twists
  • Tripod collar is small and uncomfortable
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Image quality 8
👎 Weight and size 8
👎 Low light performance 5
🤔 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Image stabilization 5

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

No customer feedback yet

Scores

Budget
Sigma
80
Canon
66
Landscape
Sigma
79
Canon
74
Portrait
Sigma
77
Canon
45
Travel
Sigma
69
Canon
76
Macro
Sigma
74
Canon
51
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
71
Canon
62
Professional
Sigma
69
Canon
65
Video Cinema
Sigma
68
Canon
57
Street
Sigma
66
Canon
59

Specifications

Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OSCanon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min150 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max600 mm40 mm
Elements2512
Groups159
Aspherical Elements03★
ED Elements6★1
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5f/22
Min Aperture5-6.3f/4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony ECanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight2.10 kg0.50 kg★
Filter Thread95 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMUSM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance580 mm280 mm★
Max Magnification1:2.9★0.24x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Pricing

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM is $789 cheaper (2.9x less).

Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS0.068score per dollar
vs
Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM0.149score per dollar

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM offers 2.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS

Scores 82 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sigma Sports 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

Travel

Also Consider