Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
Hasselblad
33 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 207975
Sigma
85 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Street
Macro
Portrait
Travel
Budget
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm | Sigma 207975 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | wide-angle-zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 38 mm | 10 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 38 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 13 |
| Groups | 9 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
| Format | medium-format | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 0.26 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | linear stepping motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 117 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.2 | 1:4 |
Pros & Cons
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma 207975
- Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average social proof (30th percentile)
Pricing
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm0.009score per dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar
Sigma 207975 offers 17.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma 207975
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
