Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm
Canon
65 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Nikon
75 Overall Score
Scores
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Travel
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Specifications
| Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 11 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 22 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | 12 | 21 |
| Groups | 9 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | 22-45★ |
| Min Aperture | 4-5.6 | 4-8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-M | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.22 kg★ | 0.72 kg |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | STM |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 3 stops | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 150 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.30x | 1:2.86★ |
Pros & Cons
Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Pricing
Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm0.125score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm0.065score per dollar
Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
