SSE 420-800mm
SSE
46 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Macro
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| SSE 420-800mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 420 mm | 100 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 800 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Super HD Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/8.3 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.52 kg | 0.30 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Dual phase linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 62 mm★ | 204 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:1★ |
Pros & Cons
SSE 420-800mm
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong versatility (70th percentile)
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
SSE 420-800mm0.660score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm0.103score per dollar
SSE 420-800mm offers 6.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
