Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm

Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm

Tamron
59 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

This Tamron 18-200mm lens is praised for its versatility and value, offering a wide zoom range that eliminates the need to swap lenses. Users appreciate the sharpness at mid-range focal lengths and the solid build, but note that image quality softens at the long end, especially in low light, and autofocus can be slow. Some warn about gray market sellers and lack of warranty, while others find the barrel distortion at 18mm and weight to be minor drawbacks for the price.

Pros
  • Versatile zoom range
  • Great value for money
  • Solid build quality
  • Good sharpness at mid-range
  • Useful macro capability
Cons
  • Soft at long end
  • Slow autofocus
  • Barrel distortion at 18mm
  • Poor low-light performance
  • Heavy for some users
👍 Value for money 12
👍 Versatility 10
👎 Image quality at long end 8
👎 Autofocus speed 7
👍 Build quality 6
👎 Low light performance 5

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Scores

Budget
Tamron
64
Nikon
84
Portrait
Tamron
38
Nikon
81
Street
Tamron
46
Nikon
75
Macro
Tamron
70
Nikon
73
Travel
Tamron
58
Nikon
71
Video Cinema
Tamron
51
Nikon
71
Landscape
Tamron
47
Nikon
68
Professional
Tamron
44
Nikon
64
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
48
Nikon
61

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mmNikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm85 mm
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Super Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/18f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-6.33.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.40 kg★0.48 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping motor★AF-S
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance18 mm★380 mm

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm

  • Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm is $982 cheaper (5.1x less).

Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm0.049score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.373score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm offers 7.6x better value for money

Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 18 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider