KIPON Colibri 75mm T2.5 75mm
KIPON
33 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| KIPON Colibri 75mm T2.5 75mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 75 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 75 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T16 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | T2.5 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | — |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weight | 0.55 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 600 mm★ | — |
Pros & Cons
KIPON Colibri 75mm T2.5 75mm
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pricing
KIPON Colibri 75mm T2.5 75mm0.026score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 2.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 13 specs.
