Xit XT52WAB 52mm

Xit XT52WAB 52mm

Xit
45 Overall Score
vs
Acouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm

Acouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm

Acouto
62 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Xit
27
Acouto
64
Street
Xit
62
Acouto
60
Travel
Xit
42
Acouto
61
Portrait
Xit
60
Acouto
58
Budget
Xit
42
Acouto
55
Wildlife Sports
Xit
41
Acouto
53
Video Cinema
Xit
47
Acouto
51
Professional
Xit
46
Acouto
46
Landscape
Xit
37
Acouto
44

Specifications

Xit XT52WAB 52mmAcouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm
Optics
Typewide-angletelephoto
Focal Length Min52 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max52 mm55 mm
CoatingMulti-coated—
Aperture
Min Aperturef/0.43f/2
Build
MountCanon EFMicro Four Thirds
Format—micro-four-thirds
Weight0.11 kg★0.20 kg
Filter Thread52 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
Stabilization—✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—37 mm★

Pros & Cons

Xit XT52WAB 52mm

  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (71st percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (70th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Acouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile

Pricing

Xit XT52WAB 52mm is $9 cheaper (1.7x less).

Xit XT52WAB 52mm3.558score per dollar
vs
Acouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm2.864score per dollar

Xit XT52WAB 52mm offers 1.2x better value for money

Xit XT52WAB 52mm

Acouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Acouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm

Scores 62 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 11 specs.

Xit XT52WAB 52mm Better at:

Portrait

Acouto Acoutos20rfz6kqu 18-55mm Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider